Doubel Combustion Chamber

All Incinerators are Doubel Combustion Chamber with One Fuel Burner Each. After Burner Technology for Completely Combustion and Cleaner World.

Read More

High Temperature Incineration

Temperature Range 800 Degree to 1200 Degree in Combustion Chamber. Temperature Thermocouple Monitor and Controller. High Quality Fire Brick and Refactory Cement.

Read More

Get Lastest News

There are latest incinerator news like technical, public news, business tender for medical waste incinerator,animal incineration, pet cremation

Read More

Nanjing Clover Medical Technology Co.,Ltd.

Email: sales@clover-incinerator.com | Tel: +86-25-8461 0201

Regular model incinerator for market with burning rate from 10kgs to 500kgs per hour and we always proposal customer send us their require details, like waste material, local site fuel and power supply, incinerator operation time, etc, so we can proposal right model or custom made with different structure or dimensions.
Incinerator Model YD-100 is a middle scale incineration machine for many different usage: for a middle hospital sickbed below 500 units, for all small or big size family pets (like Alaskan Malamute Dog), for community Municipal Solid Waste Incineration, etc. The primary combustion chamber volume is 1200Liters (1.2m3) and use diesel oil or natural gas fuel burner original from Italy.

Latest Post

Incinerator Msw3000


Basic Info.

Model NO.:MSW3000
Export Markets:Global

Additional Info.

Trademark:CLOVER

Product Description

Nanjing Clover Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Is a leading waste incinerator manufacturer in China. We are local manufacturer and one of the largest exporter of China. Pyrolytic incinerator equipment technical is main waste treatment all of the world, for Medical Waste, Animal Incineration, incineration 100, incineratoare mobile, incinerator – diesel fired, capacity: 50kg waste per hour (taiwan), incinerator: Burning capacity 20 kg/hour, Pet cremation and other Solid wste. The capacity from 10kgs/Hr. To 500kgs/Hr., up to 6ton per day. Presently, we supply different series for local customer requirements and design updated incinerator with our leading technology. The updated design feature of our range of incinerators make them one of the most cost effective in the world. 

Key Features: 
* All model with Dual combustion chamber. 
* High temperature, long lifetime of incinerator. 
* Free or minimum installation on site. 
* High burn rate, from 10kgs to 500kgs per hour, up to 6ton per day. 
* Treatment for A/B/C/D/E grade medical waste. 
* New Design for pet animal cremation business. 
* One year warranty on incinerator and parts in stock.

Items/Model MSW2000 MSW3000 MSW4000 MSW5500
Burning Rate  150 kgs/Hr. 200 kgs/Hr. 300 kgs/Hr. 500 kgs/Hr.
Feed Capacity  400 kgs 600 kgs 800 kgs 1100 kgs
Equipment Weight 7600 kgs 9500 kgs 13000 kgs 16500 kgs
Primary Chamber (Liters) 2000 3000 4000 5500
Secondary Chamber (Liters) 500 1200 1500 1500
External Dimensions (cm) 270x185x380 280x230x425 320x220x460 360x220x475
Internal Dimensions (cm) 180x115x96 240x120x105 257x147x108 300x147x125
Oil Tank(Liters) 300 500 500 500
Door Opening (cm) 59 x 81 90 x 110 108 x 128 108 x 128
Chimney (M) 10 10 14 14
Chimney Type Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Stainless Steel
Secondary Chamber  YES YES YES YES
Mix-Combustion Chamber YES YES YES YES
Smoke Filter Chamber YES YES YES YES
Combustion Fuel Oil/Gas Oil/Gas Oil/Gas Oil/Gas
Residency Time 2.0 Sec. 2.0 Sec. 2.0 Sec. 2.0 Sec.
Temperature Monitoring YES YES YES YES
1st. Chmaber Temperature 800degree–1000degree 800degree–1000degree 800degree–1000degree 800degree–1000degree
2nd. Chmaber Temperature 1000degree-1200degree 1000degree-1200degree 1000degree-1200degree 1000degree-1200degree

hospital incinerator manufacturer

Incinerator to have double combustion chamber and control amount of dioxin and other gasses emitted without being harmful.

Estimated dimensions, to manufacturers standard, but to be compact as possible. capacity: approximately 60kg per day, voltage: 220V and diesel fired.

CSH  Hospital, (Calabar, Nigeria)

Mmedical waste incinerator capable of disposing up to 0.5 cubic meter of infectious or pathological waste.

Incinerator to have double combustion chamber and control amount of dioxin and other gasses emitted without being harmful.

Estimated dimensions, to manufacturers standard, but to be compact as possible. capacity: approximately 120kg per day, voltage: 220V and diesel fired.INCINERATOR (WASTE INCINERATOR)
Designed to burn disposables that can and should be destroyed on-site. Theses wastes include infectious and contaminated “red bag.” Surgical dressings, plastic test devices and other wastes
Fast, complete, efficient waste disposal
Dual chamber combustion, Chambers insulated and lined with high temperature refractory. Programmable digital temperature controls, temperature indicators and charge recorder. Modulating control for fuel and air lowers fuel consumption.
Minimum installation and start up time
Aluminized steel jacket lined with refractory and firebrick. Monitors recorders and other accessory equipment should be available.
Charging system:
•    Vertical charge door on primary chamber.
•    Pneumatic or hydraulic ram charging system.
•    Auto shut down of the door after charging.
•    Primary and secondary chamber temperature displayed and recorded (optional)
Charging rate:
•    Up to 100kgs per hour of waste or red bag waste rated at 2200 BTU’s per kg.
Fuel:-     Natural Gas
Capacity (Cubic Mtr):    1.65M3 or more
Ave Capacity:    100kg per hour
Secondary Chamber Capacity (CubicMtr) :3.88 or more
Length (mm):    1880 or better
Width (mm):    1280 or better
Height Incl. Flue (mm):    7700 or better
Ash  Door Opening (mm):    475×900 or better
Min. Operating temperature:    90 degree centigrade
Max, Operating Temperature:    1350 degree centigrade
Residency time in Second Chamber:    2 sec
Temperature Monitoring: Both for primary and secondary chambers.
Loading SystemManual/semi-automatic
Waste destruction efficiency:> 90% by weight
Filter: Ceramic or other equivalent filters in order to reduce the induction of hazardous air pollutants, particulates, co,dioxin/furane into the atmosphere.
De ashing system: Manual/semi-automatic.
The System must be quoted complete with:-
•    Plumbing
•    Electrical panels
•    Civil works
•    Waste collection Trolleys

Finish/ Paint:-
High Quality heat resistant, two layers high-grade epoxy Paint coating.
Installed Power (Electric Voltage): 440V/ 50 Hz
Waste Management Equipment must have ;
Mobile loading trolley:    06 No’s – For transportation of hospital waste from wards to incinerator site/ room, Opening from the top.
WASTE BINS MOBILE:    06 No’s-Made of Plastic, in blue color with a cover flap.
Plastic Bags:    2000 no’s each in Red and Yellow color.
Heavy Duty Gloves Pairs: For Waste handling staff-06 Pairs
Long Shoes Pairs:    For waste handling – 06 Pairs.

MEDICAL WASTE INCINERATOR (50 C 60kg/hr)


Medical Waste Incinerator, 50 to 60 Kg/hr
Support Health Sector Support Project
Point of Installation (Hospitals) Moi Voi, Makindu, Maragua, Eldama Ravine and Isiolo District Hospitals
1.    General Description
Supply, delivery, installation and commissioning of a medical waste incinerator suitable for disposal of Medical, General and Pathological waste in a safe and clean environment.  The unit shall consist of two chambers and operate on the principal of controlled air and temperature. The unit shall consist a particulate remover (scrubbers) as stipulated in waste management regulations, 2006 (Legal notice NO. 121 of 29th September, 2006).  The Unit shall be fully automatic and controlled by an automatic electronic controlled system except loading system which shall be manual.  The unit shall be capable of incinerating between 50 to 60 kg of solid medical waste per hour.  It shall be constructed from mild or aluminized steel lined with refractory material.
Main unit
Application For incineration, general and pathological
Capacity   50 C 60 kg/h burn rate
Type Two  combustion chambers type; primary  and Secondary, controlled/forced combustion air type with a flue gas emission scrubbing unit
Operating time                Minimum 8 hours daily
Operating temperature     From 850 0C to 1200 0C, Automatic controlled
Residual Ash                    5 to 10%
    3.2     Primary Chamber
Construction Constructed from heavy duty mild or aluminized  steel Or
equal and approved equivalent
Insulation material            Refractory material lining similar or equal to calcium 
Silicate and hot face combination of heavy duty brickwork
Internal Construction        Fixed hearth type complete with gratings, concave bottom
and charging door, lined with refractory material
Charging Door                   Suitable for manual loading of wastes and with smooth 
Dear seal equivalent of Ceramic seals with hinges.
Door Lock                          Automatic, Electric type
Ash removal door    Provided, for removing resultant bottom ash leftovers                              from the Primary chamber
Gratings   Provided
Loading Manual loading of waste
Primary Burner                        Fully automatic, with fuel, temperature and speed controls with ignition system, flame detector, Air fan complete with safety features, flame failure,  Diesel fired fuel injector type and Flange mounted                                                                                                    
Blower Provided. For supplying excess combustion air through the distribution system with speed control system
Temperature Minimum exit 850 0C
Observation port To be provided with protective glass type
Construction   Constructed from heavy duty mild or aluminized steel or equal and approved equivalent
Insulation Refractory material lining
Combustion Temperatures        Above 850 0C, controlled electronically
Gas residue or retention Time       > 2 second at minimum 850 0C
Secondary Burner                    Provided, Diesel fired, fully automatic, with fuel, temperature and speed controls, With ignition system,                                                                  Flame detector, Air fan, Complete with safety features, flame failure Diesel fired fuel injector type.                                                                  Flange mounted
Ejector Provided, Venturi type, for cooling the flue gases
Combustion Air Fan Provided for supplying combustion and creating a negative drift and turbulences
Temperature Maximum  1600 0C


Allentown, PA Kills Controversial Waste Incinerator Proposal

More than two years after the deal’s controversial approval, Allentown has terminated its contract with Delta Thermo Energy, ending speculation about whether the company would ever build a proposed waste-to-energy facility in the city.

In a letter dated Sept. 26, Allentown solicitor Jerry Snyder wrote that Bucks County-based Delta Thermo Energy had “consistently failed to advance” plans for a 48,000-square-foot facility on Kline’s Island that would have burned pulverized municipal waste and sewage sludge to generate electricity.

While Delta Thermo received approval for two permits from the state Department of Environmental Protection in May 2014, the company repeatedly failed to meet extended deadlines to acquire financing for the $49 million project, the letter states. It became clear that Delta Thermo could not meet a deadline of Jan. 1, 2016, to complete construction of the plant, according to the letter.

“Under the circumstances, the city has no reasonable alternative than to declare the agreement terminated,” Snyder wrote.

Asked Tuesday if he had a response to the letter, Robert Van Naarden, president of Delta Thermo, said he would have a formal statement in the next several days. He then said he did not know what a reporter was asking about.

“I don’t need to speak to you,” Van Naarden said.

Mayor Ed Pawlowski said he was disappointed that the contract had to be terminated, but it was a financing issue, not a problem with the company’s technology that killed the deal.

“At this point in time, we need to move on,” he said.

From the time it was first discussed in 2010, the proposed plant was a highly contentious issue for members of Allentown City Council and the public. The project was panned by local environmentalists, and the components used in the proposed waste-to-energy process have never been used in combination in the United States.

Developers initially failed to convince council members of the merits of the project. The plan failed after a 3-3 vote in February 2012. One month later, developers managed to sway Councilwoman Cynthia Mota, who cast the deciding vote in favor of the proposal during a raucous March 2012 council meeting attended by more than 400 people.

Since then, Delta Thermo has had difficulty finding private financing for the experimental plan, fueling rumors that it would never be built. The city’s agreement with the company paid for up to $500,000 in consulting fees to explore the project — to be reimbursed if the plant was built — but put the burden of acquiring financing on the company.

In December 2012, Van Naarden told The Morning Call that there was “zero concern” about not finding a financial backer. The city’s letter states otherwise.

Delta Thermo “consistently failed to satisfy the financing requirement” in the agreement, Snyder states in the letter. An initial financing deadline of Jan. 31, 2013, was not met, and multiple extensions were granted, including the most recent extension that expired April 1 of this year.

Shortly before that date, Delta Thermo requested an additional extension for financing, the letter states, but city officials asked for additional assurances that the project could be completed by Jan. 1, 2016. Letters were exchanged throughout the summer between the city and Delta Thermo. In August, city officials denied a request from Delta Thermo for access to the Kline’s Island site to begin preliminary work.

In September, Delta Thermo officials told the city that they were no longer working with their previous financial backer, and planned to have the financing underwritten by Stern Bros. A letter from Stern Bros. to the city stated its “confidence” in financing the project if the deadline were extended to June 1, 2016, according to Snyder’s letter.

Allentown’s garbage contract will be rebid in 2015, Pawlowski said. There was no way the plant was going to be operational in time for that process.

“We provided every opportunity for them to make the deal; there were a number of extensions,” Pawlowski said. “We got to a point where we couldn’t move any further. I have to have some sort of a commitment in place before I bid out this contract in 2015.”

Pawlowski said he is committed to the idea of finding an alternative place for Allentown’s trash. It may still be possible to find another company that could build a waste-to-energy facility in the city, he said.

“I see this as one of the most critical issues for us, and we’re going to work for it,” Pawlowski said. “We’ve set the groundwork and a platform for us to continue to look for technologies for solve our garbage problem.”

The termination of the contract means Allentown will have to eat the nearly $500,000 it spent on consultants to vet the financial and technological aspects of the waste-to-energy plan. Two consultants provided conflicting reports to city officials about the technology needed, one saying he was confident the plan would work, the other stating there were “a number of technological, performance, operating and environmental risks.”

Pawlowski said he didn’t view the money as wasted. The city now has a “template” that can work for a potential contract moving forward, he said.

“I would have been criticized highly if I didn’t bring in the best professionals,” Pawlowski said.

Council Vice President Ray O’Connell, who cast one of the two no votes on the proposal in 2012, said it became clear in recent months that the company was never going to be able to build the facility on time. The city should try to recoup consulting fees, he said.

“My bottom line, No. 1, is that I’m extremely happy that it’s not going to be built,” he said. “No. 2, let’s go after the $500,000 that was spent.”

In addition to public outcry, Delta Thermo’s controversial proposal prompted a failed ballot question in 2013. The question, which would have asked voters if they wanted real-time monitoring of new air-polluting facilities and live disclosure of emissions data, was thrown out by the Lehigh County Board of Elections for lacking DEP approval. The decision was upheld by Lehigh County Court, and an appeal was later dismissed by Commonwealth Court.

Dan Poresky, one of the activists who opposed the plan and helped organize the ballot question, said a group of activists was working on raising $25,000 to pay two attorneys to take further legal action challenging a previous court ruling and the DEP for issuing permits to Delta Thermo. Despite rumors that financing was not in place, organizers did not want to take a chance that the plant would be built, he said.

“The city has been saved both environmentally and financially from a major mistake,” Poresky said when asked about the termination. “This is not the way to handle trash and sewage sludge.”

Councilwoman Jeanette Eichenwald, who voted against the proposal, said Delta Thermo’s proposed technology was unproven and environmentally unsafe. It was not surprising that investors could not be found, she said.

City officials should treat the experience as a lesson, Eichenwald said, and take a closer look at how the city spends money on consultants.

“I’m gratified that this phase of Allentown city life has come to an end,” she said. “I feel vindicated.”

Clover's Social Media