Doubel Combustion Chamber

All Incinerators are Doubel Combustion Chamber with One Fuel Burner Each. After Burner Technology for Completely Combustion and Cleaner World.

Read More

High Temperature Incineration

Temperature Range 800 Degree to 1200 Degree in Combustion Chamber. Temperature Thermocouple Monitor and Controller. High Quality Fire Brick and Refactory Cement.

Read More

Get Lastest News

There are latest incinerator news like technical, public news, business tender for medical waste incinerator,animal incineration, pet cremation

Read More

Nanjing Clover Medical Technology Co.,Ltd.

Email: sales@clover-incinerator.com | Tel: +86-25-8461 0201

Regular model incinerator for market with burning rate from 10kgs to 500kgs per hour and we always proposal customer send us their require details, like waste material, local site fuel and power supply, incinerator operation time, etc, so we can proposal right model or custom made with different structure or dimensions.
Incinerator Model YD-100 is a middle scale incineration machine for many different usage: for a middle hospital sickbed below 500 units, for all small or big size family pets (like Alaskan Malamute Dog), for community Municipal Solid Waste Incineration, etc. The primary combustion chamber volume is 1200Liters (1.2m3) and use diesel oil or natural gas fuel burner original from Italy.

Latest Post

HICLOVER Incinerators

HICLOVER, Nanjing Clover Medical Technology Co.,Ltd, supply system solutions for medical environmental protection, animal and pet cremation engineering, other municipal solid waste incineration project.

We supply single combustion chamber, double combustion chambers, three combustion chambers and multi-combustion chambers waste incinerators for laboratory, clinic, hospital, medical center, hygiene clinical waste destruction with medical disposable, biological waste, medical plastic waste, hazardous waste, red bag waste, needle disposal, gauze and bandages, sealed sharp containers, pathological waste, trace-chemotherapeutic wastes, etc.

Our range of incinerators cater for small to large scale animal cremation related businesses, such as poultry farms, cattle farms, sheep farms, pig farms, stables, kennels, testing laboratory, catteries, pet crematoriums.

The incinerator burn waste in primary combustion chamber and burn the smoke from primary combustion chamber again to make sure environmentally friendly with no black smoke, smelless, reduce pathogenic bacteria infection.
System solutions for medical waste environmental, including waste incineration, smoke emission treatment, high-temperature sterilization, ultraviolet sterilization lamp, waste shredder, needle destroyer, medical waste package, sharp containers, etc.
The pet cremation equipment humanized design with movable platform, small space covers for modern pet cremation business owner all over the world.
The containerized mobile incinerator mounted in ISO container before leave factory, pre-installation, no incineration house build construction, movable by truck and ultraviolet lamp sterilization inside.
HICLOVER is growing brand for environmental protection field, and market share with most of Africa, Middle East, Southeast Asia countries and part of North America, Europe territory. We are trusted partner for governmental organizations, non-profit organizations, international contractors, logistics organizations, military, pet cremation business owners, etc. We have export experience more than 40 countries, including war zone like Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, South Sudan.

We are china incinerator manufacturer, contractor and exporter. Manufacturer make reasonable price for incinerator customer, supply medical incinerator, hospital incinerator, animal incinerators, hog incinerators, pet cremation equipment, small incinerator, pet incinerator, animal incinerator, portable incinerator, small animal incinerator, infectious waste pyrolysis machine, laboratory incinerator. HICLOVER help customer reduce purchase budget, custom made function, quality products and friendly service.

 

Tel: +86-25-84610201 Email: [email protected]  Website: www.hiclover.com
Key Features:

— Full range incinerator with Economized Small Scale incinerator, Standard Small-Large Scale incinerator, General Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator, Pet and Animal Cremation, Containerized Mobile Incinerator, High Efficient Environmental Waste Incinerator.

— Single combustion chamber, double combustion chambers, three combustion chambers and multi-combustion chambers waste incinerators.
— System solutions for medical waste environmental.
— High burn rate, from 5kgs to 1000kgs per hour.
— New Design for pet animal cremation business.
— HICLOVER, trusted partner with years of experience.
Items/Model TS10(PLC) TS20(PLC) TS30(PLC) TS50(PLC)
Burn Rate (Average) 10 kg/hour 20 kg/hour 30 kg/hour 50 kg/hour
Control Mode PLC Auto. PLC Auto. PLC Auto. PLC Auto.
Combustion Chamber 100L 210L 330L 560L
Internal Dimensions 50x50x40cm 65x65x50cm 75x75x60cm 100x80x70cm
Secondary Chamber 50L 110L 180L 280L
Smoke Filter Chamber Dry Scrubber Dry Scrubber Dry Scrubber Dry Scrubber
Feed Mode Manual Manual Manual Manual
Voltage 220V 220V 220V 220V
Power 0.75Kw 0.83Kw 0.99Kw 1.2Kw
Diesel Oil Consumption (kg/hour) Ave.8.4 Ave.10.9 Ave.13.3 Ave.16.9
Natural Gas Consumption (m3n/hour) Ave.10.1 Ave.13 Ave.16 Ave.20.2
Temperature Monitor Yes Yes Yes Yes
Temperature Protection Yes Yes Yes Yes
Oil Tank 100L 100L 100L 100L
Feed Door 30x30cm 45x40cm 55x50cm 70x55cm
Chimney 3Meter 3Meter 5Meter 5Meter
Chimney Type Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Stainless Steel
1st. Chamber Temperature 800℃–1000℃ 800℃–1000℃ 800℃–1000℃ 800℃–1000℃
2nd. Chamber Temperature 1000℃-1200℃ 1000℃-1200℃ 1000℃-1200℃ 1000℃-1200℃
Residency Time 2.0 Sec. 2.0 Sec. 2.0 Sec. 2.0 Sec.
Gross Weight 1500kg 2200kg 3000kg 4500kg
External Dimensions 140x90x120cm 160x110x130cm 175x120x140cm 230x130x155cm

Items/Model TS100(PLC) TS150(PLC) TS300(PLC) TS500(PLC)
Burn Rate (Average) 100 kg/hour 150 kg/hour 300 kg/hour 500 kg/hour
Control Mode PLC Auto. PLC Auto. PLC Auto. PLC Auto.
Combustion Chamber 1200L 1500L 2000L 3000L
Internal Dimensions 120x100x100cm 150x100x100cm 170x120x100cm 210x120x120cm
Secondary Chamber 600L 750L 1000L 1500L
Smoke Filter Chamber Dry Scrubber Dry Scrubber Dry Scrubber Dry Scrubber
Feed Mode Manual Manual Manual Manual
Voltage 220V 220V 220V 220V
Power 1.38Kw 1.69Kw 2.57Kw 4.88Kw
Diesel Oil Consumption (kg/hour) Ave.20.4 Ave.24.2 Ave.33 Ave.44
Natural Gas Consumption (m3n/hour) Ave.24.5 Ave.29 Ave.39.6 Ave.52.8
Temperature Monitor Yes Yes Yes Yes
Temperature Protection Yes Yes Yes Yes
Oil Tank 200L 300L 500L 500L
Feed Door 80x60cm 80x60cm
Chimney 10Meter 10Meter 14Meter 14Meter
Chimney Type Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Stainless Steel
1st. Chamber Temperature 800℃–1000℃ 800℃–1000℃ 800℃–1000℃ 800℃–1000℃
2nd. Chamber Temperature 1000℃-1200℃ 1000℃-1200℃ 1000℃-1200℃ 1000℃-1200℃
Residency Time 2.0 Sec. 2.0 Sec. 2.0 Sec. 2.0 Sec.
Gross Weight 6000kg 8500kg 11000kg 16000kg
External Dimensions 260x150x180cm 300x160x190cm 400x210x300cm 450x210x300cm

the proposed Puerto Rico Resource and Renewable Energy Project in Arecibo

the proposed Puerto Rico Resource and Renewable Energy Project in Arecibo
SAN JUAN — Eight years into a drive to build a $650 million waste-to-energy plant in Arecibo, the first of its kind in Puerto Rico, Energy Answers is moving closer to its goal. But roadblocks remain, including one serious enough to challenge the project’s financial viability.

Despite uncertainty, EA has to date invested $15 million in development expenses and remains committed to the project, according to one of the company’s local advisers.

“All new things engender a certain reserve, an apprehension. This is something new,” said EA’s environmental consultant and attorney Rafael Toro-Ramirez referring to the incinerator that the Albany, N.Y.-based company touts as a viable solution to Puerto Rico’s waste management crisis.

Out of 28 landfills islandwide, nine have sections complying with federal standards but only two — Ponce and Humacao — are in full compliance. Seven landfills are in the process of being closed down, further reducing the island’s waste disposal capacity.

Meanwhile, recycling is minimal (under 12 percent) and the island continues to generate garbage at the staggering rate of 3.6 million tons per year.

Despite strong opposition by environmentalists, EA has passed the federal government’s permitting process and is now waiting for the Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board to decide on the two most important permits at the local level.

While sailing the permitting process would be a big step forward for EA, the coast is far from clear.

If the incinerator is to stay in the running, EA must resolve key business aspects: namely, secure the needed waste stream and the water supplies essential for the plant’s operation.

For a while these issues appeared to have been resolved when, during the former Luis Fortuño administration, EA arranged with separate government agencies to have steady access to both these vital resources. EA also signed up to supply the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority with the energy the plant would generate.

Things took a different turn once the García Padilla administration came in. The favorable arrangements that EA had managed to secure were overturned and the company has found itself left without the supply guarantees that a costly investment of this kind needs to proceed.

Unless the situation changes in favor of the company, the plant’s financial viability appears to be seriously in doubt right now.

Meanwhile, opposition to the project, which began with a Coalition of Organizations Against the Incinerator, has broadened to include a wide cross-section of Puerto Rican society. Opponents include the Sierra Club and Arecibo Basura Cero (Zero Garbage), the Mayors Association, the Mayors Federation, the Puerto Rico College of Physicians and Medical Doctors, and cattle farmers from the island’s north coast.

Financial viability

Puerto Rico’s first incinerator, to be built on a 36-acre lot, would burn up to 2,100 tons of municipal solid waste daily and produce 77 MW of renewable energy. The plant also would recover recyclables and up to 280 tons daily of ferrous and non-ferrous materials.

To be viable, an incinerator needs three things: a supply of waste, enough water to run the operation, and a disposal site for the large amount of ashes generated in the process.

EA says ash disposal is no problem but it can’t say the same about garbage or water.

The island produces some 10,000 tons of garbage each day of which EA would need 20 percent on a daily basis.

To secure the needed waste stream, EA needed to turn to individual townships and arrange for them to send their waste to the Arecibo incinerator.

Instead, it found an easier way out.

In April 2012, the company signed a contract with Puerto Rico’s Solid Waste Management Administration binding the agency to compel island townships to send their solid waste to the company, a service for which they would have to pay a dumping charge or tipping fee of $36 per ton.

This a higher amount than the $18 to $32 most townships pay to dispose of garbage in the island’s landfills (with the exception of a few towns that charge up to $100 a ton for this service).

Also, the tipping fee would be subject to yearly reviews with base charge increases tied to the inflation level.

Island mayors wasted no time in showing their displeasure. They complained the contract undermined the principle of municipal autonomy and endangered their budgets.

In 2013, the Puerto Rico Justice Department found the contract to be in violation of the Autonomous Municipalities Act of 1991 on the heels of which SWMA sued EA to request the contract’s invalidation. The case is before San Juan’s Court of First Instance.

EA’s Toro underplayed the loss of the waste contract, which would force EA to negotiate individually with each township.

According to Arecibo environmentalist Javier Biaggi, the decision “doesn’t stop the project… but they would have to go town by town like they started doing initially.”

That might not be easy.

The two organizations that group the island’s mayors by political affiliation, namely the Mayors Federation of the New Progressive Party and the Mayors Association of the Popular Democratic Party have expressed opposition to the incinerator. Unless there is a change in their stance, EA might have a tough job enlisting mayors to its cause.

The only NPP mayor reportedly backing the incinerator is the mayor of Arecibo. His support is said to be based on economics: By one estimate, the township stands to benefit to the tune of $2 million in yearly business license taxes (known as “patente municipal.”)

In defending the contract that EA signed with SWMA, Toro said it protects the Puerto Rican public.

“The contract guaranteed that towns will have to manage their waste legally,” Toro said.

He expressed little sympathy with mayors who find the tipping fee onerous.

“It’s not the monetary cost but the environmental cost that must be considered,” Toro said. He pointed to the future environmental costs that will be incurred from continuing to dispose in landfills that do not meet federal standards.

“Forget that the incinerator belongs to EA. It is an alternative that complies with the law,” he said.

And then there is the issue of water.

In December 2013, the Department of Natural and Environmental Resources announced it would not grant EA a water franchise to draw water from Caño Tiburones’ El Vigia Pump Station despite a previous arrangement EA had worked out with the agency during the Fortuño administration.

As part of the earlier agreement, signed in August 2012, EA committed to making certain capital improvements at the station in exchange for access to the pump station.

Toro said tat out of 180 million gallons of water entering the lagoon daily, EA needs two million per day for processes and cooling.

Caño Tiburones is one of the island’s most important hydrological resources. In justifying its latest decision, DNER said the continuous extraction of water from El Vigia Pump Station would lead to “the degradation of the natural reserve’s ecosystem.”

EA has requested a reconsideration and the case is currently under administrative review. A DNER spokesperson said a public hearing has been scheduled for Oct. 25.

Permits

AE’s second attempt at establishing Puerto Rico’s first incinerator (an initial attempt took place between 1999 and 2001 under the name of Renova) is proving a drawn-out process.

The company has been pursuing its goal for eight years: according to Toro, it originally submitted the project in 2007 during the administration of Gov. Anibal Acevedo Vilá.

Despite receiving a temporary air permit from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 2012, it wasn’t until March 2013 that the Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit finally came through. Although opponents challenged the decision, the Environmental Appeals Board upheld the permit but instructed EPA to update the greenhouse gas emissions control requirements in the PSD permit.

According to José Font, in charge of the Caribbean Environmental Protection Division, the agency evaluated the project “in an impartial manner.”

Toro said EA has most of the permits it needs for the incinerator.

EQB has already approved EA’s environmental impact statement but must still decide on the air emission source permit and a permit for handling non hazardous solid waste, Toro said.

In addition to EPA’s PSD, the company has the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Wetlands Mitigation Permit (requiring EA to undertake compensatory wetlands mitigation) and the Planning Board’s site permit.

Some of these permits are currently in litigation, however. According to a local environmental lawyer, challenges to the Wetlands Mitigation Permit and the PSD permit have been filed in federal District Court in San Juan and D.C. District Court, respectively.

In their petition to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, opponents asked the court to review EPA’s decision granting the PSD and the Environmental Appeals Board decision confirming the permit. The petition was filed July 17, 2014.

Opposition

Arecibo’s WTE plant will use EA’s patented Processed Refuse Fuel technology for more efficient energy production and 30 percent less ash emissions.

Company officials have dismissed concerns over air pollution, saying the public’s fears are based on an outdated picture of waste combustion plants emitting soot and smog into the air.

Passing the intensive EPA review shows that the incinerator “is safe and complies with the strictest U.S. air standards,” officials told one newspaper.

To obtain the EPA air permit, the company had to demonstrate that its pollution controls at the plant would be as strict or stricter than those of any other plant under construction in the U.S. today, according to EPA.

For all the new technology and the conscientiousness with which the permitting agencies are evaluating the project, opponents remain skeptic about the plant’s safety.

Air and water contamination are high on their list of concerns but they also worry about the disposal of toxic ashes.

According to Biaggi, EA officials have said the plant would generate some 400 tons of ash daily but the amount could be closer to 600 tons, enough to turn Arecibo into “another Sahara desert.”

While he would not disclose where the ashes would be discarded, Toro said there are three or four landfills that comply with Subtitle D of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), regulating such disposals.

Opponents also are concerned about the ultra fine particles from burning materials, including organic chemicals and toxic substances such as dioxins and furans, to be released into the air by the incinerator. Because of their minuscule size, these particles are difficult to capture in pollution control devices. Fine particulates can remain suspended in the air for a long time and also travel far. Besides posing a health risk to people, these pollutants contaminate the food chain.

Lead emissions are yet another source of worry, especially since the area where the WTE plant will be located has already suffered from this type of contamination.

In 2011, EPA levied a $112,500 fine against Arecibo-based Battery Recycling Co., a lead smelter that recycles used motor vehicle batteries and produces about 60 tons of lead per day. The company, located a short distance from the proposed incinerator, committed to investing more than $3 million in pollution control upgrades and community projects.

Opponents have raised other arguments against the incinerator: It will generate far too few direct jobs and will thwart the island’s recycling efforts which the government should be promoting aggressively instead.

The incinerator will create 150 permanent direct jobs but as many as 4,000 jobs during the three-year construction period, Toro said.

In addition to investing $650 million in the plant, the company also plans to spend approximately $30 million annually in local purchases of goods and services, according to officials.

Puerto Rico and Maryland

Despite setbacks, Energy Answers appears determined to go on.

“We are going to continue defending the project,” said Toro.

To opponents, the company’s determination is a reflection of the potentially high financial rewards tied to this type of investment.

According to one estimate, the incinerator stands to generate more than $100 million per year in annual revenue from waste incineration, biomass energy production, and recovery of recyclables and ferrous (iron) and non-ferrous scrap metal.

In addition to its Puerto Rico venture, EA currently is building the nation’s second largest WTE incinerator in the Curtis Bay neighborhood of Baltimore. The $1 billion plant would have a capacity to handle 4,000 tons of waste daily.

As in Puerto Rico, it has generated stiff opposition.

The project was recently halted when Maryland state authorities issued a temporary work stoppage order over the company’s failure to purchase emissions reductions credits (ERC) required as part of restrictions placed on its air quality permit. According to one newspaper report, the company faced $8 million in fines for failing to buy the emissions offsets.

More burners to incinerate invasive beetle headed to Hawaii

burners to incinerate

The Hawaii Department of Agriculture says we’re only in the beginning stages of the eradication and it could take years to wipe out.

“This is a very serious pest. It affects not only coconut palms, but all other palms. It will also affect bananas, pineapples, plumerias, so parts of what we know of Hawaii could disappear because of this beetle,” said Rob Curtiss, pest control branch manager for the Hawaii Department of Agriculture.

On Wednesday, KHON2 got a look at a new machine that’s being used to get rid of the beetles and the mess they leave behind.

It’s called an air curtain burner, a large incinerator that can burn any plant or green waste that may be infested with the beetle.

air curtain burner (1)

“These are trees that were cut down on base, about 120 of them,” Curtiss said. “We want to burn them before they’re able to get infested. It’s the best method we have of getting rid of the material.”

“It’s quicker. It’s more efficient,” said Lonnie Felsie, Naval Facilities Engineering Command. “It burns and then the residue that’s left is almost nothing. It’s five percent of whatever volume we put inside and so the ashes are almost nothing.”

One air burner costs around $80,000 and shipping it to Hawaii costs about $16,000. The one currently being used is owned by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The military also has four air burners on order, and the state Department of Agriculture plans to order one within the next couple of months.

“So we’ll have six of these machines on Oahu, destroying materials that could be infested by CRB,” Curtiss said.

The CRB has also been found at Barbers Point and Campbell Industrial Park, but traps have been placed all across Oahu.

State officials want to make sure it doesn’t spread any further.

“Just be aware of what this insect is and help us out by calling it in if you see something,” Curtiss said.

incinerator for medical waste

Waste Management Planning

The generator of a waste is responsible for its safe management from cradle-to-grave. Using raw materials efficiently and reducing the amount of waste generated is the most important step in waste management planning.  For example, through improved waste management planning, it may be possible to reduce or eliminate the need to burn or incinerate waste altogether.  Undertaking a waste audit will help to identify the type and amount of waste being generated, the costs of current management options and examine opportunities for better managing the waste. This information will also enable the generator to implement a waste management regime that is tailored to its own unique needs, location and circumstances.

Even with improved waste reduction measures in place there will be waste generated.  Waste by its nature is usually a mixture of different unwanted materials. The segregation and diversion of different types of waste is an effective way to reduce the amount of waste requiring costly handling, storage, treatment and disposal. Segregation also enables the reuse of certain types of waste for a different purpose.  Reuse activities may be undertaken either on-site or off-site.

Treatment and disposal is the last step in effective waste management and should be undertaken only after all other practical reduction and reuse options have been examined.  A wide variety of treatment and disposal options exist and each must be examined before deciding on a final method, regardless of whether waste is to be treated and disposed of on-site or off-site. If burning and incineration is the method of choice, equipment must be designed and sized accordingly to accommodate the type and quantity of waste being produced. As described in the following section, open burning is capable of safely destroying a limited number of types of waste. While incinerators are capable of safely destroying a wider range of waste, many types of waste must still be diverted. Because of this, on-site segregation remains a critical component of any waste management plan.

Overall, the following principles should be used to guide responsible solid waste management planning:

Know your waste by conducting a waste audit.
Reduce the amount of solid waste produced by implementing strategic purchasing policies that focus on the substitution or reduction of purchased products as well as product design, composition and durability.
Reuse waste where different purposes can be identified.
Segregate and divert mixed waste streams enabling waste to be reused or recycled, thereby reducing the amount of waste to be disposed of.
All practical disposal methods should be examined. Burning and incineration of waste should be considered only where other practical methods do not exist.

If burning and incineration is used, the equipment chosen should be designed and sized to accommodate the waste produced, minimize fire hazard and result in the complete combustion of the waste.

Double Combustion Chamber Incinerators

Incinerator Introduction

Primary combustion chamber temperature # 850°C with no cold spots

Secondary combustion chamber: Shall be constructed with an exterior casing (reinforced to withstand internal pressures without deflection or damage to the refractory or other components) and provided with refractory lining and insulation

Secondary combustion chamber temperature 1100°C or higher

Secondary combustion chamber residence time # 2 seconds after the last injection of air in the secondary chamber

Primary and secondary burners: Separate electrically spark-ignited primary burners and secondary burners with automatic control shall be used to achieve the specified temperature requirements in the primary and secondary chambers. The flames of the primary and secondary burners shall not impinge on the incinerator walls or floor.

Energy source for burners Diesel fuel eil

Air supply: Air supply in the primary and secondary chamber should be regulated between 30%-80% and 170%- 120% of stoichiometric amount respectively. Suitable flow measurement devices shall be provided on the primary and secondary air ducting. The combustion air shall be supplied through a separate forced draft fan after accounting for the air supplied through burners

lnsulation: lnsulation to be used for masonry, reinforced concrete, or non-combustible material shall prevent damage to the foundation from excessive heat and shall be of a thickness to limit the outer casing to a maximum temperature of 66°C in an ambient temperature of 21°C when the incinerator is operating at full capacity.

Refractory: Refractory shall be #super duty# and heat-resistant to a minimum of 1100°C in the primary chamber and 1250°C in the secondary chamber. Refractory shall also be abrasion resistant in the prlmary chamber, constructed of plastic or castable type refractory, designed to prevent bulging and destruction due to heat stress, capable of supporting more than twice the hourly burning rate and preventing leakage of fluids, and with a minimum thickness of 11O mm for walls and hearths

Medical Waste Incinerator 50 to 60 Kg/hr

Medical Waste Incinerator, 50 to 60 Kg/hr
Item Quantity 5 No.
Support Health Sector Support Project
Point of Installation (Hospitals) Moi Voi, Makindu, Maragua, Eldama Ravine and Isiolo District Hospitals
1. General Description
Supply, delivery, installation and commissioning of a medical waste incinerator suitable for disposal of Medical, General and Pathological waste in a safe and clean environment. The unit shall consist of two chambers and operate on the principal of controlled air and temperature. The unit shall consist a particulate remover (scrubbers) as stipulated in waste management regulations, 2006 (Legal notice NO. 121 of 29th September, 2006). The Unit shall be fully automatic and controlled by an automatic electronic controlled system except loading system which shall be manual. The unit shall be capable of incinerating between 50 to 60 kg of solid medical waste per hour. It shall be constructed from mild or aluminized steel lined with refractory material.
2. Composition
2.1 Main unit
2.2 Accessories
3. Performance specifications
3.1 Main unit
3.1.1 Application For incineration, general and pathological
3.1.2 Capacity 50 – 60 kg/h burn rate
3.1.3
Type Two combustion chambers type; primary and Secondary, controlled/forced combustion air type with a flue gas emission scrubbing unit
3.1.4 Operating time Minimum 8 hours daily
3.1.5 Operating temperature From 850 0C to 1200 0C, Automatic controlled
3.1.6 Residual Ash 5 to 10%
3.2 Primary Chamber
3.2.1
Construction Constructed from heavy duty mild or aluminized steel Or
equal and approved equivalent
3.2.2
Insulation material Refractory material lining similar or equal to calcium
Silicate and hot face combination of heavy duty brickwork
3.2.3
Internal Construction Fixed hearth type complete with gratings, concave bottom
and charging door, lined with refractory material
3.2.4
Charging Door Suitable for manual loading of wastes and with smooth
Dear seal equivalent of Ceramic seals with hinges.
3.2.5 Door Lock Automatic, Electric type
3.2.6
Ash removal door Provided, for removing resultant bottom ash leftovers from the Primary chamber
3.2.7 Gratings Provided
3.2.8 Loading Manual loading of waste
3.2.9
Primary Burner Fully automatic, with fuel, temperature and speed controls with ignition system, flame detector, Air fan complete with safety features, flame failure, Diesel fired fuel injector type and Flange mounted
3.2.10
Blower Provided. For supplying excess combustion air through the distribution system with speed control system
3.2.11 Temperature Minimum exit 850 0C
3.2.12 Observation port To be provided with protective glass type
3.3 Secondary chamber
3.3.1
Construction Constructed from heavy duty mild or aluminized steel or equal and approved equivalent
3.3.2
Insulation Refractory material lining
3.3.3
Combustion Temperatures Above 850 0C, controlled electronically
3.3.4
Gas residue or retention Time > 2 second at minimum 850 0C
3.3.5
Secondary Burner Provided, Diesel fired, fully automatic, with fuel, temperature and speed controls, With ignition system, Flame detector, Air fan, Complete with safety features, flame failure Diesel fired fuel injector type. Flange mounted
3.3.6 Ejector Provided, Venturi type, for cooling the flue gases
3.3.7
Combustion Air Fan Provided for supplying combustion and creating a negative drift and turbulences
3.3.8 Temperature Maximum 1600 0C
3.4 Chimney
3.4.1
Construction Constructed from heavy duty mild or aluminized steel or equal and approved equivalent Refractory material lining
3.4.2 Length 10 m above ground
3.4.3 Bore about 350mm diameter
3.4.5 Discharge temperatures About 850 0C
3.4.6 Emissions To comply with standards in section 9 of third schedule of the waste management regulations, 2006.
3.5 Electrical System
3.3.5
Control unit Fully automatic with microprocessor based control unit (PLC) automating all operations of the incinerator. Capable of monitoring all incinerator parameters With large LCD or similar for display of all progress
Parameters i.e. temperature of primary and secondary chambers, turbulence and time
With status lamp
With user of defined and differed programmed operating cycles for different type of loads/conditions
With safety interlocks, display of errors and visible and audio alarms.
System for continuous emission monitoring
3.5.2
Isolator switch Supply and install isolator switch 240V, 100A for the incinerator unit, including all necessary cables 10m
3.5.3
Distribution Board Supply and install distribution board. 100 A, complete with MCBs suitable for the rating of the incinerator unit and associated equipment. Wiring to be done according IEE regulations.
3.5.4
Wiring Make provisions for wiring the isolator switch, Distribution Board control unit to Incinerator and all associated equipment inside to incinerator room. Working length 20m. Wiring to be done using PVC Sheath cable on steel conduits and trucking and in accordance with IEE regulations
3.6 Fuel System Supply and install storage fuel tank inside the incinerator room at an elevated position (about 1.5 m above the floor)
3.6.1
Fuel Tank Tank capacity, 400 liters, constructed from preferable suitable metallic material or high temperature resistance material
Fuel type Diesel
3.6.2
Fuel Lines Supply and install fuel lines, complete with fuel filters, pump, sight glass, fuel level and all other safety devices and connect from fuel tank to incinerator.
Working length , 20m
Fuel pipe material; Special copper pipes or similar and approved materials
4 Physical characteristics
4.1 Main unit Floor mounted, stand alone, fixed hearth type
Dimensions About 1.2 x 2.2m (WxD)
5 Operating environment
5.1 Power Requirements 240V,A/C 50Hz, single phase, with PE
Ambient temperature 10 0C to 40 0C
Relatively humidity 40% to 90%
6. Accessories
Rack, 2 m long 1 piece
6.1 Waste cart, stainless steel 1 piece
7 Spare parts
7.1 Burner 1 set
7.2 Fuel Filters 6 sets
7.3
All other spare parts required for replacement during and after 12 months of operations. 2 pieces of each
8 Quality Standards
8.2
Manufacturing standards NEMA Kenya Act, 1999
Legal Notice No.121 of 29th September 1999 on waste Management Regulations
EU waste incinerator Directive- EC 76/2000
BS 3316
WHO Emission Standards
World Bank Emission Standards
or any other internationally recognized standards
Conformity to standards CE marked or any other internationally recognized documents
9 Local back up service
9.1 Available Should be available locally
9.2 Capacity to service equipment Manufacturer/Agent shall have adequate facilities, spare parts, qualified and skilled technical staff to offer comprehensive maintenance service and spare parts sales for the lifespan of the incinerator
10 Delivery point
10.1 KEMSA For inspection and verification
10.2
Moi Voi, Makindu
Maragua, Eldama Ravine and Isiolo Hospitals For installation, testing, NEMA Certification and commissioning
11 Pre installation works
Provide for foundation plinth, necessary plumbing works, Fuel piping works, Elevated Diesel oil storage tank, electrical works including cabling, trunking and switch gears required to install the incinerator and all its accessories to required IEE standards
12 Installation and testing Complete installation and set up of the incinerator at designated as per manufacturer’s instructions
Provide fuel and test run the incinerator for 3 hours daily for 7 days
13 Training
13.1
User training On site user training on operation and daily up keep
13.2
Maintenance training On-site maintenance training on Preventive Maintenance, repair and trouble shooting
14 Technical Documentations
14.1 User manuals 2 sets
14.2 Service manuals 2 sets
14.3 Drawings 2 sets
15 Commissioning
15.1 Testing and Commissioning of the machine to the satisfaction of the user
16 Warranty
16.1 Equipment Minimum of one year after commissioning on all parts.
16.2 Equipment system Nil
17. Maintenance contract
17.2 Comprehensive preventive & repair service Provided a 12 months comprehensive preventive and repair service contract inclusive of spare parts and material from date of commissioning

Clover's Social Media